Cryptoが衝突するとき：オレゴンのコインベースとの壮大な戦いと消失トークン値の場合

オレゴンのトップリーガルイーグルは、Coinbaseの未登録のCrypto Circusで急降下します。
SECの法廷のフロップを反映しているデジャヴードラマ。

オレゴン州検事総長のダン・レイフィールドであるダン・レイフィールドの官僚のかすかな香りと合法的な専門用語と混ざり合っているマルトノマ郡巡回裁判所の静かなホールでは、コインベースの巨人に対して武器を取りました。これは単なる争いではありませんでした。それは、オレゴン人が無許可のデジタルトークンの庭で戯れることを許可することで、コインベースが風に妥当性と書類を投げたという宣言でした。

容疑の砂利？そのコインベースは、不注意な羊飼いのように、その群れが未登録の証券の危険な畑にさまよい、消費者保護の要塞なしに気まぐれなものと点滅する約束を交換します。そして、インターネットコンピュータープロトコル（ICP）よりも優れたスケープゴートは、700ドルのめまいの高さから屈辱的な7ドルに急落しました。

As the leviathan of American crypto exchanges, Coinbase holds the keys to the kingdom of tokens, adding them at will and orchestrating trades with the flair of a stage director promoting a dubious play. The Oregon authorities cry foul, accusing the exchange of sneaky ‘pump-and-dump’ theatrics that would make even the most cynical market dealer blush.

The plot thickened when the SEC, having staged its own courtroom drama against Coinbase only to have the act dismissed in February 2025, left the field clear for Oregon to step in and pick up the gauntlet. The state alleges that Coinbase customers were left dangling on a rope of market volatility, blindfolded to the risks lurking beneath, demanding not only compensation but a new script for crypto conduct.

Coinbase’s Rebuttal: Why Have a Sequel When the Original Bombed? 🎭

Paul Grewal, the legal maestro of Coinbase, responded with the sort of disdain reserved for reruns nobody asked for. The Oregon lawsuit, he proclaimed, was merely a tired encore of the SEC’s prior flop, already dismissed “with prejudice” — legal speak for “don’t even think about trying this again.” To him, the spectacle was a pointless squandering of precious state resources.

Standing firm in the belief that digital currencies are more akin to commodities than ticking securities time bombs, Coinbase pledged to duel with the Oregon lawsuit like a knight defending its honor. The company’s chief counsel didn’t hold back: if the state truly cared for the crypto realm, it would craft sensible rules rather than raid the legal armory with outrage and indifference.

Meanwhile, the backdrop of this legal saga is a country divided, with the Trump-era SEC opting for a softer touch on crypto titans like Coinbase and Kraken. Oregon’s suit flashes like a lightning bolt across this tepid federal canvas, underscoring the patchwork of governance where states don their own armor to protect their citizens—or at least attempt to.

The lawsuit paints a picture of losses so vast they might inspire tragedy or comedy, depending on one’s affection for the chaos of markets. The ICP token, once a trophy d’art (digital art?), now a cautionary tale, is the poster child of investor woe and Coinbase’s alleged profit from transaction fees—a cruel irony for those who lost fortunes.

Oregon’s Department of Justice takes up the mantle of consumer defender, striving to shield the unwary from the wild west of crypto, where exchanges list and promote tokens as recklessly as barbers offering questionable haircuts.

Federal Fumble Leaves State to Play Crypto Cop

With the SEC’s case falling like a house of cards and their lead attorney shuffled off to an IT gig (some say exile), Oregon’s legal squad saw no choice but to fasten its boots and march into the breach. They brought forth a tome—171 pages thick—mapping Coinbase’s operations like a spy novel, alleging unregistered deals and broken promises to the statute books.

Yet, undeterred by the legal tempests, Coinbase anchors itself in Oregon, asserting its compliance like a proud ship in stormy seas. Wielding federal court victories as shields, notably from Judge Failla, the exchange argues its conduct is no misstep but a dance with the current rules—rules apparently written in invisible ink.

2025-04-20 10:40